Beiträge von leroytwohawks

Ich weiß, dass diese veröffentlicht wurde im letzten Jahr, aber ich lief nur über sie und hatte über ein Hydro-Prototyp habe ich geschrieben im Jahr 2009 von dieser wieder musste ich es eine Menge Forschung am Ende tun damals und am Ende ist es zum Selbstkostenpreis verkauft zu tun und Zeit, um das Öl zu ersetzen, damals, die hätte mussten wurden von Sinn gemacht. Ich bedauerte es etwa eine Minute zu verkaufen, nachdem ich es verkauft.

Hier kannst du Bilder von der Uhr aus meinem Album auf meinem Watchuseek Seite sehen und was ich als Beschreibung.

Ein frühes Sinn Prototyp ihrer Hydro besaß ich. Es kam von einem Sinn Mitarbeiter in Deutschland. Das war die Inspiration für die Bell & Ross Hydromax, da dies ein paar Jahre vor und Sinn, die Fälle, für sie zu Bell & Ross geliefert produziert wurde. Das Öl hatte vor bei einem Batteriewechsel zu meinem Kauf verloren gegangen ist, und nach der Entdeckung, würde es mindestens sechs Monate warten und $ 500 bis $ 800 Kosten von Sinn, um es gewartet haben, wurde es gehandelt. Eine, die ich wünschte, ich hätte gehalten haben.

Ich weiß, dass diese veröffentlicht wurde im letzten Jahr, aber ich lief nur über sie und hatte über ein Hydro-Prototyp habe ich geschrieben im Jahr 2009 von dieser wieder musste ich es eine Menge Forschung am Ende tun damals und am Ende ist es zum Selbstkostenpreis verkauft zu tun und Zeit, um das Öl zu ersetzen, damals, die hätte mussten wurden von Sinn gemacht. Ich bedauerte es etwa eine Minute zu verkaufen, nachdem ich es verkauft.

Hier kannst du Bilder von der Uhr aus meinem Album auf meinem Watchuseek Seite sehen und was ich als Beschreibung.

Ein frühes Sinn Prototyp ihrer Hydro besaß ich. Es kam von einem Sinn Mitarbeiter in Deutschland. Das war die Inspiration für die Bell & Ross Hydromax, da dies ein paar Jahre vor und Sinn, die Fälle, für sie zu Bell & Ross geliefert produziert wurde. Das Öl hatte vor bei einem Batteriewechsel zu meinem Kauf verloren gegangen ist, und nach der Entdeckung, würde es mindestens sechs Monate warten und $ 500 bis $ 800 Kosten von Sinn, um es gewartet haben, wurde es gehandelt. Eine, die ich wünschte, ich hätte gehalten haben.

Thanks for the information.

So who did come up with the Hydro Bell & Ross or Sinn? I know Bell & Ross has the patent but was that when they worked with Sinn?

Is that the prototype they where referring to in 1990? As I don't recognize what model this watch is But I like it I like the two piece casing around the watch!

Zitat von Catalan22

I have been trying to get information on a Sinn 810 Q HYDRO I traded for you can see the thread here: Info Sinn 810 Q HYDRO Was it the first HYDRO?

On your thread here you talk about a Sinn Hydro prototype in 1990 I believe my watch is from 1994 or 1995 as it looks like the one from the 94 Sinn catalog and the back is stamped C-92201 with HYDRO below it but it still has on the back case 20ATM/200M I know the HYDRO was rated at 8000M so I assume this is a early model that just does not reflect the 8000M yet.

On the link bellow there is a Interview with Carlos Rosillo from Bell & Ross where he says they have the patent on the Hydro system: use of liquid silicon in the watch case for perfect water-tightness and perfect readability. Yet they did not make the Hydro Challenger until 1997 which means the Sinn 810 Q HYDRO came first, right?

Interview with Carlos Rosillo if you want to read it: http://www.timezone.com/library/tzints/tzints0013

I was also told this watch was owned by a former Sinn employee and it looks like the last time the battery was changed the oil was not replaced. I'm going to send it in to Sinn for a full service with oil change, sounds like an automobile doesn't it.

Now that was a mouth full
Kevin

The Sinn 810 Q was supplied with an oil filling as it states on the link I gave. As far as the reflections here is a link to one that was sold a few years ago this on clearly is marked with the 8000m on the dial and you can see shadows under the crystal I don't know if that's what you were referring to or not? http://forums.timezone.com/index.php?t=tree&th=557768&mid=1604055&rid=83252&rev=&reveal=

That "HYDRO" marking is confusing. That's what bothers me but I was told this was owned by a ex Sinn employee so maybe he used a different dial so it would not show as a quartz?

I think on Markus's page he refers to the HYDRO and from what I understand all the HYDRO'S are oil filled!, that's what makes them a HYDRO. And as far as Daniel's point on the membrane there were several models of oil filled watches that did not have a membrane.

Is there a way to look up this model of HYDRO from the serial number? C-92201 with HYDRO below it.

Zitat von HappyDay989

That's exactly the point, Daniel: That particular watch doesn't feature an oil filling! The link to Markus' SINN Info Page confirms it, too!

You can see that when you carefully look at the pics: there are reflexions on the crystal that shouldn't be visible if the watch was filled with a liquid. Moreover, the black colour of the dial should look much more substantial when seen through an oil filling - just compare the pics in this thread to photos of the UX.

So, the WR marking is correct as the "conventional" 810 Q was only pressure-tested for 20 bars. It's just that "HYDRO" marking that is confusing. According to Markus' SINN Info Page the 810 Q was never supplied with an oil filling.

The Sinn 810 Q was supplied with an oil filling as it states on the link I gave. As far as the reflections here is a link to one that was sold a few years ago this on clearly is marked with the 8000m on the dial and you can see shadows under the crystal I don't know if that's what you were referring to or not? http://forums.timezone.com/index.php?t=tree&th=557768&mid=1604055&rid=83252&rev=&reveal=

That "HYDRO" marking is confusing. That's what bothers me but I was told this was owned by a ex Sinn employee so maybe he used a different dial so it would not show as a quartz?

I think on Markus's page he refers to the HYDRO and from what I understand all the HYDRO'S are oil filled!, that's what makes them a HYDRO. And as far as Daniel's point on the membrane there were several models of oil filled watches that did not have a membrane.

Is there a way to look up this model of HYDRO from the serial number? C-92201 with HYDRO below it.

Zitat von HappyDay989

That's exactly the point, Daniel: That particular watch doesn't feature an oil filling! The link to Markus' SINN Info Page confirms it, too!

You can see that when you carefully look at the pics: there are reflexions on the crystal that shouldn't be visible if the watch was filled with a liquid. Moreover, the black colour of the dial should look much more substantial when seen through an oil filling - just compare the pics in this thread to photos of the UX.

So, the WR marking is correct as the "conventional" 810 Q was only pressure-tested for 20 bars. It's just that "HYDRO" marking that is confusing. According to Markus' SINN Info Page the 810 Q was never supplied with an oil filling.

Thanks for the info but I guess I meant to say the first HYDRO by Sinn And did I do OK with what I payed? And why does it say 20Bar on the back if it's a HYDRO?

Sorry for all the questions

Thanks for the info but I guess I meant to say the first HYDRO by Sinn And did I do OK with what I payed? And why does it say 20Bar on the back if it's a HYDRO?

Sorry for all the questions

There is one here: http://forums.watchuseek.com/showthread.php?t=244284

He wanted to trade me for my Omega but I traded it for a Sinn 810 Q HYDRO I don't know what he wants for it but it's in good condition It shows "Trade pending" but that was from me.

Kevin

There is one here: http://forums.watchuseek.com/showthread.php?t=244284

He wanted to trade me for my Omega but I traded it for a Sinn 810 Q HYDRO I don't know what he wants for it but it's in good condition It shows "Trade pending" but that was from me.

Kevin

This is my first Sinn I'm going old school.

Sinn 810 Q HYDRO

This is my first Sinn I'm going old school.

Sinn 810 Q HYDRO

I am now a Sinner

I just got this watch I was told it was owned by a ex Sinn employee. Now according to this site : http://www.sinn-uhren.info/30.html it should have 8000m on the dial and I would assume that indicates 8000 meters yet on the back it says 20 ATM/200M So is this a transition model? It also does not have the Quartz logo on the dial as the ones in the pictures. Any information on the watch would be great I think I got a good deal on it at $650 being how rare they seem to be, let me know if I'm wrong.

Thanks
Kevin

I am now a Sinner

I just got this watch I was told it was owned by a ex Sinn employee. Now according to this site : http://www.sinn-uhren.info/30.html it should have 8000m on the dial and I would assume that indicates 8000 meters yet on the back it says 20 ATM/200M So is this a transition model? It also does not have the Quartz logo on the dial as the ones in the pictures. Any information on the watch would be great I think I got a good deal on it at $650 being how rare they seem to be, let me know if I'm wrong.

Thanks
Kevin

Thanks for the help and sorry if it was hard to understand my post. I don't read or write German I was using a translator so I don't know how it turned out in German.

Thanks for the help and sorry if it was hard to understand my post. I don't read or write German I was using a translator so I don't know how it turned out in German.

Vielen Dank, dass Sie, wissen Sie, was sie verkauft werden, für die nun verwendet werden?

Vielen Dank, dass Sie, wissen Sie, was sie verkauft werden, für die nun verwendet werden?

Ich hätte gerne ein paar Informationen über den Sinn 815 F: Ich bin auf
der Suche zu erhalten, und nicht finden kann viel über sie. Gibt es
einen guten Sinn oder nur eine billige Uhr, wurde der Kauf Sinn. Und
was ist ein guter Preis für eine in gutem Zustand jetzt? :cl: